Richard, I have been using MonacoEZcolor2.5 for a while. I am happy with it. But you have to remember, that it's not a ready solution out of a box. In order for any calibration software to work you have to do the work yourself as well. If you chose the color space of the monitor you have to have the matching ambient light for viewing prints, and a subdued light in the vicinity of the monitor. Also, you have to make the profiles of the paper (each paper has to have it's own profile). And since the using the scanner for the profiles is not the most accurate method you have to tweak the profile afterwards in the provided facility until your test prints mach what you have on the screen. Otherwise is a money thrown out of the window. I do believe, that provided you follow all the steps of the process you will be quite satisfied with your prints using the Monaco software for calibration. Hope it helps. Jack _________________________________________________ Jack M Kucy JMK Gallery (www.jmk-gallery.com) 917-991-2096 jmk@... Member of ASMP (www.asmp.org) _________________________________________________ ...a riveder le stelle Richard Cooke wrote: > Martin, > > In a message to Mark (I don't know his last name) you said: > > "I tried Monaco was not happy with the results." > > Could you elaborate on what results you got and why you weren't happy? > > I do b&w and a bit of color and I am using the Monaco monitor > calibrator. I'm not completely happy with my color prints and maybe > I'm chasing something that's not my fault. > > Thanks, > > Richard Cooke > --
Message
Re: [Digital BW] For Martin (somewhat OT?) Monaco didn't work
2003-09-18 by Jack M Kucy
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.