* -----Original Message----- * From: Richard Cooke [mailto:rcooke@redmtnengr.com] * Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:17 AM * To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com * Subject: [Digital BW] For Martin (somewhat OT?) Monaco didn't work * * * Martin, * * In a message to Mark (I don't know his last name) you said: * * "I tried Monaco was not happy with the results." * * Could you elaborate on what results you got and why you weren't happy? * * I do b&w and a bit of color and I am using the Monaco monitor * calibrator. I'm not completely happy with my color prints * and maybe I'm chasing something that's not my fault. * Richard, This was 2+ years ago and I bought the Monaco basic package in an effort to get my scanner, monitor and printer calibrated. It did not include a monitor "spyder" or sensor. Since the monitor "calibration" was by eyeball it didn't work out very well for me and the printer profiles really weren't usable. I think for this type of application to provide a decent level of accuracy you need an instrument(s) to measure the output. Scanners don't seem to be a workable replacement for spectrophotometers. I wound up buying ColorVision's OptiCal with the Spyder and ProfilerPro along with a Spectrocam spectrophotometer to measure printer output. This all cost me about $2,500 which was actually pretty cheap as they were having a special package deal. ColorVision now has a package that is about half that price but I have no idea as to the quality of the "spectro-colorimeter" included. The bonus with the ProfilerPro was that it could create profiles of grayscale ink sets which the Monaco would not do at all at that time. I don't recommend going with the ProfilerPro and Spectrocam unless you want to make high quality color profiles yourself. You would probably be better off having a few profiles made for you professionally with really high end equipment at $100 to $200 each. OptiCal and the Spyder (or something similar from another company, perhaps Monaco has something now) is in the $200 to $300 range and worth the expense. Martin Wesley http://www.carolyn.cc/Guests/MartinWesley/pages/MW_01.html http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html
Message
RE: [Digital BW] For Martin (somewhat OT?) Monaco didn't work
2003-09-18 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.