I agree with both of you. I have 9600 running with IP and I had many problems at beginning specially I live in Europe. But they were able to solve most of the problems in a moment they understand that they are real problems. There are still problems with units/default units (meter/inch) and others. But generaly the software payed for itself very fast. I like their ICC profiles - not so exact as custom made, but consistent and very good generated - no any "holes" or compressed areas in them. If I rotate red hue with +6 it is almost exact for my printer. Martin Sluka At 20:31 -0700 18.9.2003, Tom Baker wrote: ******************************************* >I run Imageprint on my 9600. >Also, for some reason, since I got Imageprint, I have not had any >monitor/printer calibration problems. I do pay attention to the ICC >profiles from end-to-end in my processing. But, I'm not sure that's >why I haven't had any problems. Maybe luck. After all, this is >still photography, and every photographer needs a little luck now >and then, no matter how well you plan. > >Tom Baker > >crown_red <crown_red@...> wrote: > >>Conclusion: I'm glad I bought ImagePrint. I'll keep it. I'll feel bad >>a year from now when new hardware, software, or marketing >>developments give the same performance for half the price. --
Message
Re: [Digital BW] ImagePrint experiences
2003-09-19 by Martin Sluka
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.