Martin, Can't you set the black and white points in curves just as well (along the x axis)? Is there a difference between using levels to do this and constraining the x axis in curves? I thought a discussion earlier this summer established that levels tends to degrade the image much more than a curve adjustment. Steve --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > * -----Original Message----- > * From: Mark Hahn [mailto:markhahn2000@y...] > * Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 8:58 PM > * To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > * Subject: Re: [Digital BW] New Photoshop CS -- aka Photoshop 8 > * > * > * Not really... at least if you agree that the human eye can't > * distinguish between more than 16 million colors. The real problem > * with 8 bits per channel is with the fixed precision math that is > * performed for each adjustment... you get rounding errors which become > * cumulative and destructive. This is much reduced when calculations > * are done in 16 bit mode. > * > * mark > * > * PS I am working on an image editing package that works at a fixed 64 > * bit depth per channel and maintains butter smooth tones through out > * any number of adjustments... but it runs way slower than PhotoShop;) > * > Mark, > > I think that 256 shades of gray are probably more than adequate for B&W > printing but as you note, adjusting an 8-bit file causes that number to > drop. Fortunately we can actually lose quite a bit and still come up with a > good print. I suspect that as few as 100 shades of gray may be acceptable in > some images but it is very easy to fall below an acceptable threshold if you > are not careful. > > With the 65,536 shades of gray available in a 16-bit file the chances of > having it visually degrade during Photoshop adjustments is greatly reduced > to say the least. Although I imagine if you try hard enough you will still > get things out of whack! > > At 64 bit or 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 shades of gray you are probably way > beyond what is needed. In all honesty I wonder if we couldn't do just fine > with say 12-bit or 4096 shades of gray. In any case you don't need more that > your scanner or digital camera can output and this has been in the 10 to > 14-bit range. > > It is interesting to note that even when you scan 10 to 14-bit data to a > 16-bit file you can lose image data if you do not spread that data over the > full 16-bit range before you start applying gamma or curve adjustments. In > other words you need to set your black and white points in levels first and > seperately before any other adjustments. > > Martin Wesley > http://www.carolyn.cc/Guests/MartinWesley/pages/MW_01.html > http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html
Message
Re: New Photoshop CS -- aka Photoshop 8
2003-09-30 by Stephen Kobrin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.