Digital BW, The Print

Jeff

This is very helpful given my current purchasing dilemma.  A couple of basic
questions (and please excuse any ignorance):

1. In the first set of images (I assume the Nikon is on the right), why is
the Nikon image so ³grainy² ?  The skin looks quite bad as a result.
2. Any chance you can put the drum scan alongside the Nikon?

Cheers

Steve


From: "jsinger986" <jhsinger@...>
Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:33:08 -0000
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] MF Scanners -- off topic

Another view thrown in the pot...

I have the Epson 3200 and I just bought the Minolta Dual Scan Pro.  For
prints with 
my Epson 2200 I am happy with the Epson 3200 scanning 120 film (not for 35mm
though).  But, my use is for stock where I want the best quality and OPTICAL
sharpness for my scans.  Even though it may not make a difference in the
final useage 
of the image, buyers look at sharpness as a factor when looking at scans of
comporable images.  Most scans in quality stock agencies are done by
professionals 
using drum scanners and film scanners at the least.

Here is a scan with a Nikon 8000 versus the Epson 3200.  This is a scan of a
120 neg 
and it is a 100% crop of the image as it came out of the scanner.  No
sharpening on 
either.  I'll let you decide which is which, but to me its a clear
difference:
http://www.jeffsingerphotography.com/quickview/nikonvsepson.jpg


I decided to buy the 3200 based on the review  at photo-i.co.uk.  I was
impressed 
that there was not a significant difference between the 3200 and a drum scan
( a 
difference but not a huge one).  Well, i don't know where he got his drum
scan done 
and on what scanner, but here is my drum scan versus 3200 scan and I see a
huge 
difference (although as I said the difference will not show on a Epson 2200
print with 
a good application of sharpening).
http://www.jeffsingerphotography.com/quickview/drumvsepson.jpg

Of course, I wouldn't expect a $500 flatbed scanner to match a drum scan or
even a 
film scan.  But, if sharpness is something that matters and your going
beyond a 
13x13 print, this is something you may want to consider.  For me, I'm going
to sell 
my 3200 and my Minolta should be here any day.

Jeff

----------------------------------------------------
Jeff Singer Photography
jeff@jeffsingerphotography.com
http://www.jeffsingerphotography.com


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, mfaphoto@o... wrote:
> The Epson 3200 delivers nice results. Probably not as good as film scanners,
but 
good. Since there is probably a huge price difference, so get the 3200 and
see how it 
works for your purposes. If you don't like it, sell it for almost what you
paid and get 
the film scanner.
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
 
 ADVERTISEMENT
 <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=194081.3897168.5135684.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705019
182:HM/A=1732163/R=0/SIG=11n0nglqg/*http://www.ediets.com/start.cfm?code=305
10&media=zone>  

Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]