>>Unfortunately, there IS a problem with edge to edge sharpness. A >>glass holder would be desirable, but I don't think such a thing >>exists for this scanner. Just a thought: has anyone tried glass slide holders for slides? I realize this would introduce other problems, but if you didn't get the dreaded newton rings, it might be worth the effort in some cases. This problem is much worse on the medium format Nikon, mf film being so much flimsier, etc. At least there you do have a glass carrier available. Ernst Dinkle once posted a link to detailed instructions showing how to take a MF strip holder and convert it to a glass carrier; perhaps the idea could be applied to a 35mm carrier? I have a simpler (though not as effective) way to deal with the problem. I use 2" lengths of miniature 'I' beams or square tubes (model-making construction components picked up at a hobby shop) tacked down between frames and at any unsupported ends to hold the film a bit flatter. They are held down by double-surfaced sail- maker's tape, which is aggressively tacky, and lasts through many applications if kept out of the dust. The tape is available from canvas/sailmaking shops, or in art supply stores in smaller rolls. As I said, this isn't as effective as a glass carrier, but it helps a lot and is much less trouble than keeping six surfaces dust free. Hope this helps Steve Karafyllakis http://www.stevekphoto.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Dimage 5400 vs Nikon Coolscan 4000
2003-10-01 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.