I'm not sure that Adobe does it, but from my tests only a small sub- sample of an image is all that is really needed for a accurate Histogram... the big question is how useful is it really? I mean, are you really not going to apply the specific curve to an image which makes it *right* because you don't like the look of the histogram? mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "J Michael Sullivan" <michael@h...> wrote: > I'm sure the Adobe dudes figured out a way to optimize it for the G5 chip too :( > > No matter, moving Gigabytes of 16bit layers is gonna require one kickass machine! > > mjs > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Kobrin" > <skobrin@h...> wrote: > > This question may be rendered moot in Photoshop CS as according to > > Evening's introduction you can have a "live historgram" running while > > you use curves. As I understand it, you will be able to see the > > impact of any curves ajustment on the histogram in real time. > > > > The bad news, at least for some of us, is that it looks like CS > > requires a Pentium III processor. I have a II with plenty of memory > > that works just fine with PS 7. > > > > Steve
Message
Re: levels and curves
2003-10-01 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.