>Unfortunately the dust removal in Vuescan affects > the entire image, so I prefer to use the Minolta software for this and > do something else while it's scanning. I use my laptop for scanning and photosho (vt) on the desktop. > > 4. The Nikon is known for some softness around the edges due > > to a very narrow depth of field and failure to hold the negative > > perfectly flat . I have found this to be true for the Nikon, but could > not determine > > in a test scans if the Dimage was any better. > > Unfortunately, there IS a problem with edge to edge sharpness. A glass > holder would be desirable, but I don't think such a thing exists for > this scanner. > Anti-Newton glass is made for the Nikon 4000, These are contact addresses Email:mike@..., Web Site http://www.fpointinc.com that I found on the Yahoo Nikon 4000 group Mike emailed me as follows: <<You have to replace the top piece of plastic with our glass and bend the small aluminium tabs thst hold the plastic up and out of the way of the glass. This means that your holder effectively is permanantly converted to a glass holder since the tabs will eventually break off if you bend them each time the plastic is replaced by the glass. It can be ordered online at http://www.fpointinc.com/cgi-local/web_store/web_store.cgi Just enter the word "nikon" in the search window and glass sizes will come on screen. Indicate the number you need and add them to the shopping cart. Then check out.>> I've only just received mine and cannot comment other than to say it sort-of clips into the aluminium part of the film strip. For me the fit was difficult and not entirely satisfactory as the glass could be thinner:I guess it would have been if it were not then more susceptible to breakage. It cost US$33 for shipment to my son in continental USA and he shipped it to me across the pond. Colin
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Dimage 5400 vs Nikon Coolscan 4000
2003-10-02 by colingruk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.