Andre, > Itching for another fast and furious debate like the last one you had > on the filmscanners list ? People got so fed up over there that some > left the list and the list owner is even thinking of shutting it down. Not looking for a debate at all, nor do I wish to participate in one. People can form their own opinions...all I did was suggest they take that web site with a grain of salt... And, though I participated in the discussion (8 bit vs 16 bit tonal moves with color image files), I certainly didn't have much to do with "people getting fed up and the list owner thinking of shutting it down". I hadn't posted to it for days (as I was on the road), when the bulk of the "discussion" transpired. Needless to say, the discussion was mostly technical, and had little "personal" content, which is how this should be in this type of newsgroup...and a LOT of people actually learned a lot from it...at least from the responses I saw on-list, and off. There are certain subjects that, for some reason, some people are adversely effected by, as it rocks their (sometimes mis-) understanding of how things work. Apparently, that discussion was one of them, and UV filters can be on other lists. Do keep in mind, no one was able to rise up to the challenge that I posed, which should say a lot about the reality of what was being debated ;-) Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Lenses reviews
2003-10-03 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.