Mitch/Austin: Go info. I have never seen this behavior but I have never specifically looked for it. Thanks for the info. Duncan --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mitch Alland <malland@x> wrote: > > I know Michael and can state without a doubt that he has no agenda > > and is not biased in any way by any of the equipment manufacturers or > > other outside factors. Granted you are reading his opinions, but his > > opinions are experienced and educated and he will not hesitate to say > > something is a piece of crap if it is. > > I wonder more about his eye and judgment: in his review of the 1270 he > stated that it printed neutral B&W "straight out the box" (i.e., with > the Epson drive and Epson profiles), and then repeated that claim for > the 2200. Some of his other judgments on some digital SLRs being better > or equal to medium format film cameras are also, to say the least, > questionable. > > BTW, on his forum, he seems sometimes to get irascible: several times > when a poster questioned his statements or judgments he responded that > he doesn't have time for this type of this thing and would rather go > out and take pictures -- a strange and unpleasant type of statement for > someone who tests so much equipment and spends so much time writing > about it. As Austin states: when challenged Reichmann takes his marbles > and goes home. > > --Mitch/Paris
Message
Re: Lenses reviews
2003-10-04 by Duncan Staples
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.