Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Win2k or XP?

2003-10-06 by Martin Wesley

* -----Original Message-----
* From: Lyons Cox [mailto:lyonscox@...] 
* Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 11:12 PM
* To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
* Subject: [Digital BW] Win2k or XP?
* 
* 
* I'm not really interested in a debate of Mac vs. PC.  Hadn't 
* seen a thread start regarding this either.
* 
* A few concise comments about Win2k vs. XP would be greatly 
* appreciated.  Obviously the source of the question would stem 
* from the upgrade requirements for PS CW (8) from a Win98 
* machine.  In looking at some reviews it seems the XP takes up 
* quite a bit of memory and don't read much about the Win2k.
* 
* Was thinking of reformatting the hard drive anyway and 
* thought it would be best to install new system if I'm going 
* to do all that.
* 

Cleavis,

XP is the replacement for 2000 so go for the newer version. It has been out
for quite awhile, "patched" extensively already and will get more support
than 2000. Recently upgraded from 2000 to XP on my main machine and
everything seems fine. XP has been running on my wife's machine for 18
months or so and has been very stable.

Which ever one you install, make sure you go to Windows Update to get
everything up to date.

Martin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.