Sanders, I've tried both OPM and QTR, and so far, have found QTR to give more consistent results. This is without tweaking the curves, and with EEM. You don't even have to reboot to run OPM, but it's not quite as convenient, as it does require a switch to classic. You might want to try both programs. Sarah --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, sandersm@a... wrote: > I went back to look at Clayton's post of his conclusions regarding the tech > print exchange. I was surpried to learn that there was no comparison there > between OPM and QTR, running on a Mac and printing to an Epson 2200 loaded with > Epson ink cartridges. > > After a false start down another path, I am left with the choice, at least > for now, between OPM and QTR. I'm running OS X but am not averse to rebooting > in OS 9 if OPM renders a better image. Paper: For the sake of argument, > let's say EEM and Ilford Galerie Smooth Gloss. (I'm looking at Moab Entrada > and the New Epson PremierArt papers as well.) > > Which software should I install? And why? > > Sanders McNew > www.mcnew.net > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Mac + 2200: QTR or OPM?
2003-10-08 by jessupsa
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.