Digital BW, The Print

Matthew  -
 
I assume your dpi settings were the same on both.  What was your dpi?  I have a 2880x1440 printer.  The 1280 is 2880x720.  I was always under the impression that the slight difference in dpi would not be visible in most situations (maybe someone has done some subjective testing on this).  Is it possible that you have some alignment issues with the 1280?
 
Tom Baker

Matthew Born <mborn@...> wrote:
Paul, thanks a million for your replies. I had in fact used the warm tone
(.03) curve on the Satine but the problem is much more than tones � the
prints are really bad (whereas the PR and EEM are very nice, so I guess it�s
the economy...er, paper). Truthfully, though, it�s not a disaster since I
get great stuff on the 2200/OPM combo, and I can always use up the Satine
there and move on to something new on the 1280. I�m encouraged by your
tryout of the Moab paper and am also greatly interested in Epson�s
PremierArt paper.

I have a new issue, though, and a wholly unexpected one: the prints from my
2200 are visibly sharper than those from the 1280. Since it was an apples to
oranges thing, I�d never really compared them before. I lined up the tones
so that could be divorced from the equation, and then printed the same image
on PR and EEM on both printers (OEM in the 2200, UT in the 1280). I didn�t
use the Satine because of the problem with the UT inks. My wife thought I
was nuts, but a client came by and I showed him the two prints � and within
a minute he zeroed in on the area of critical focus in the image and said
�Look at the rock here � the cracks along the front � this one (the 2200
print) is a lot sharper.� In the meantime I had run a cleaning cycle,
confirmed the test pattern, and very critically run the head alignment
utility (using a loupe to pick the best choices all along). I�ve now made
three or four prints, on PR and EEM, and the 2200 is a little sharper, a
little more detailed, in each case. In a vacuum, you�d never see anything
wrong with the 1280 prints. But there is a clear difference when compared
side by side with the 2200. I found this quite surprising since I�d always
assumed the actual image quality from the two would be more or less
identical.

Matthew Born 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]