wouldn't that be called "nearest neighbor interpolation" :) mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Colorado Light" <coloradolight@w...> wrote: > That's not interpolation, it's just that a printer uses more than one dpi to > make a ppi. Your print still has just 220 ppi. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Hahn" <markhahn2000@y...> > > > I find that I generally need at minimu 220ppi original image data to > > get a good b&w print... with certain images and interpolation and > > processing I can sometimes get away with much less. 300ppi seems > > unquestionably good. The Epson printer driver then interpolates up > > to 720 so there might be something to sticking to fractions of that > > or interpolating up to 720... but in the casual experiments I've done > > using different interpolation schemes I have't seen any *real* > > improvement which makes it worth the time (do the math... you can end > > up with some huge files)... but others disagree. > > > > mark > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 10/9/2003
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Optimum resolution for inkjets
2003-10-14 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.