Hi Mark, The conversion from PPI to DPI is called dithering, or halftoning...not interpolation. In the process of dithering, it may very well use interpolation as part of the pixel to dot conversion. At least with the Epson driver it does, where, as you state, it interpolates the NPPI to 720PPI (at least for the "desktop" printers), and then derives it's dither from the 720PPI data. Regards, Austin > wouldn't that be called "nearest neighbor interpolation" :) > > mark > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Colorado Light" > <coloradolight@w...> wrote: > > That's not interpolation, it's just that a printer uses more than > one dpi to > > make a ppi. Your print still has just 220 ppi. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Mark Hahn" <markhahn2000@y...> > > > > > I find that I generally need at minimu 220ppi original image data > to > > > get a good b&w print... with certain images and interpolation and > > > processing I can sometimes get away with much less. 300ppi seems > > > unquestionably good. The Epson printer driver then interpolates > up > > > to 720 so there might be something to sticking to fractions of > that > > > or interpolating up to 720... but in the casual experiments I've > done > > > using different interpolation schemes I have't seen any *real* > > > improvement which makes it worth the time (do the math... you can > end > > > up with some huge files)... but others disagree. > > > > > > mark
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Optimum resolution for inkjets
2003-10-14 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.