Digital BW, The Print

Again, The reason for labeling is not to promote one brand over another, it is to give basic information.
Museums, which I would consider 'the last word' on this sort of thing (Museums being the most branding
neutral, and academically oriented) calls them 'inkjet prints' (first), and then other information *follows*
that.  The point is clear information, not branding or any other commercial promotion.

By going down the 'branding' road, we put ourselves in the same position of that group that trademarked the
name 'Giclee', this clearly has *nothing* to do with art, and is totally a commerce issue.

Harvey Ferdschneider
partner, SKID Photography, NYC


Julian Thomas wrote:

> I'm calling mine Carbon Pigment Quadtones - if they want more detail I'll
> give it, but pushing Piezo first and 'inkjet' second.
>
>
> > The problem is there are too many variations of 'inkjet'.  I am trying to
> >keep it simple.  I may rethink calling them Piezotypes since pushing the
> >technology may not be such a bad idea.
> >
> > - Jennifer
> >
> >
> >   Jennifer Drucker wrote:
> >
> >   > I call them Carbon Pigment on Paper, I used to call them Carbon
> Piezotypes but too many questions were
> >   > raised.
> >
> >   But Jennifer, they are *not* what you say....They are 'inkjet prints'
> that use carbon pigment inks.  'Carbon
> >   Pigment Inkjet Prints' would be more appropriate.
> >
> >   Harvey Ferdschneider
> >   partner, SKID Photography, NYC
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]