For: Mike Botelho > Also, there's the upcoming Epson 4000 that will supposed have drivers > that will handle B&W better. (Will this mean new drivers for the > 2200/7600/9600 that also do better?) Plus, having Photo Black and > Matte Black available as a software change makes it all the more > viable as a printer for both color and B&W. (Though I'm unsure if > I'd be willing to pay that much more than the 2200 for a few extra > inches. At that point, why not just spend a bit more and go with the > 7600 and get an impressive size increase, I think, maybe.) I have a 7600 and am printing with ImagePrint. First, my take on ImagePrint: I am very happy with it -- B&W is spot-on neutral without metamerism, and the TintPicker allows for subtle "toning" of the print if you want to make the prints, say, warmer or have a selenium-toned look. In my view the results are as good as B&W prints I previously made using Piezography. For color prints, I have found the ImagePrint paper profiles to be excellent obviating the need and cost and bother of having custom profiles made -- at least this seems to be the case for the 7600 and 9600 printers whose manufacturing tolerances, i.e., variability between individual printers, seem to better than those of the 2200. If you use a good number of different papers -- apparently ColorByte will profile any paper free that for which there is not already a profile -- this means that you can save a lot of money that you would have spent on custom profiles. The ColorByte color profiles are a lot more accurate than the canned Epson profiles and a little better in color, particularly in terms of shadow detail, than the free Bill Atkinson profiles available for the 7600/9600 which themselves are excellent. (The current version of ImagePrint has a "slider" that allows you easily to control how much shadow detail or shadow compression that you want). As for the 7600, it is an excellent printer but the problem is that it costs about $80 in wasted ink to change between Photo Black ink (used for printing on glossy-type papers) and Matte Black ink (used for printing on matte papers). For me this is a real problem. When I first got my 7600, I started using Photo Black and Epson Semi-Matte paper (a glossy-type paper) and eventually printed most of the prints for my forthcoming exhibition using this ink and paper combination. When I used up the Photo Black I switched to Matte Black and started printing on EEM and Photo Rag. However, when I needed to complete the rest of my exhibition prints I found that the matte color prints did not look as good (in terms of "sharpness", saturation and depth of the blacks) as the Photo Black/Semi-Matte paper combination; and this view was confirmed by every one who saw the prints, which means that I need to change back to Photo Black and Semi-Matte paper to complete the prints for my exhibition. The trouble is that B&W prints with Photo Black and Semi-Matte don't look very good and exhibit horrible "bronzing." This problem is solved by the new 4000 printer which has both Photo Black and Matte Black which allows you to change between glossy-type and matte paper at will without any cost. The 2200 involves insignificant ink waste in changing black inks but the small size of the ink cartridges means that ink costs are very high. With the 4000 you can use the same 220ml cartridges that the 7600/9600 use. (Incidentally, I found that with the Ultrachrome inks both B&W and color prints looked somewhat better on EEM than on Photo Rag.) From the above you can see that there is a great advantage in the 4000 if you want to print both B&W and color which, with the papers currently available, means that you need to use both the Photo Black and Matte Black, unless you like the way the color prints look on matte paper, and some people do. In my case, I already have the 7600 and I like to be able to make 24x36 inch prints but the only hope on the horizon right now is that there might be a new glossy-type paper which is not subject to bronzing for B&W prints. There is one new paper, Oriental Graphica FB Glossy, that may have such characteristics according to a July posting by Robert Morrison, and I'll be interested to see what results people have with this paper. In the meantime, does anyone have any solutions for printing good B&W with Photo Black? --Mitch/Paris
Message
Re: Ultra Tones & Dedicated B&W vs ImagePrint & 7-Color
2003-10-23 by Mitch Alland
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.