OK, I give up... :- ) You guys will call whatever you do, whatever you want. I thought we were all interested in what was considered the 'accepted form' for labeling our work, within the established academic art community...but you guys are clearly crazy rebels, and who am I to argue with a rebellion to conquer the evil art establishment. ;- ) Harvey Ferdschneider partner, SKID Photography, NYC "J. Arthur Davis" wrote: > > Jennifer Drucker wrote: > > > > > I call them Carbon Pigment on Paper, I used to call them Carbon > Piezotypes but too many questions were > > > raised. > > > > But Jennifer, they are *not* what you say....They are 'inkjet prints' that > use carbon pigment inks. 'Carbon > > Pigment Inkjet Prints' would be more appropriate. > > > > Harvey Ferdschneider > > partner, SKID Photography, NYC > > Ok, so a lithograph should be called a stone pulled print on paper, a > serigraph (spelling?) should be called a silk screen print on paper. As > artists we get too hung up on the technology and not the art for the arts > sake. What is wrong with Carbon Pigmented Prints on Paper, or Pigmented > Carbon Prints on Paper? > > Jim Davis > http://www.visual-artists.com > davis.jarthur@... > Fine art printmaker [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Gallery Rules
2001-10-07 by SKID Photography
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.