from what I've seen, Imageprint and a 2200 will give excellent color and b&w from epson inks, but combined it will cost you over $1000 and your per print cost is high as well. mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Kobrin" <skobrin@h...> wrote: > Am I correct that with a 2200 and some additional software (a RIP) > that I can get reasonable B&W prints with Epson inks? I do not print > frequently (3 or 4 prints a week on average) and the clogs, clots and > cleaning cycles are driving me nuts. I do this for fun and, at least > tonight, it is not. I am very pleased with what I am doing not and > if I could get prints that are equal to what I get now with an Epson > 1200 and MIS VM inks without the problems, I would switch in a > minute. I have a 1280 I use for color and selling that and using a > 2200 for both seems attractive. The other alternative is to convert > the 1280 to B&W ultrachromes and buy a small printer for the little > color I do -- mostly family pictures. However, I am not sure that > would solve the clog problem given that I print infrequently. > > Steve
Message
Re: 1280 vs. 2200 question
2003-10-27 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.