Tom, Hmm, I must be missing the luck part! ;>) Anyway, tonight I played around with a Custom Dot Gain curve per the instructions posted in the Files section of the ImagePrint group. I believe Mitch Alland wrote this document. Thank you, Mitch. Being an alumni of the old Piezography school of B&W digital printing, I am fairly comfortable with Gains of the Dot, etc. Only took a couple of prints and now my printed image looks, to my eye (and my wife's) exactly like what I see in PS. I'm a happy camper. Will let the print dry overnight and check it again tomorrow just to make sure it doesn't "dry down" too bad. Now, my last issue is 16-bit grayscale. Doesn't seem to work for me, but, again, others report no problems with 16-bit files...naturally! :>( Alan Huntley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Baker" <tbaker1328@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:00 PM Subject: Re: Re: [Digital BW] 1280 vs. 2200 question > Alan - > > I'm on Win. I use Gray Gamma 2.2 or, the gray profile that comes from my Nikon 8000 for everything. I can't really tell the difference in the two. But, I'm consistent in my use of ICC profiles. Seems to work just fine. And I don't use anything to calibrate my moitor except the PS gamma tool and my eye. I think there's some luck involved here somewhere, too.
Message
Re: Re: [Digital BW] 1280 vs. 2200 question
2003-10-28 by A. Huntley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.