I'm not sure which 16 bit problem you're refering to. But, I've had some problems with 16 bit images presented to Imageprint as PSD files. It seems to be related to something that happens when flatten a file in PS. If I save the same file as a TIF file, and print it with IP, I don't see the problem. Actually, the problem comes long before the print. In the IP preview the image is almost obliterated. I haven't contacted Colorbyte about this because I just print the TIF file. I can't see any difference in printing the TIF file vs. the PSD file. I actually curious about this. Maybe an email to IP. This only happens on grayscale files, not color (yet). I don't know if this is related to you issue or not. As for the dot gain issue, are you saying that you change the working space gray profile in PS depending on the image? I actually did try Dot gain working space profiles at one time, but, I am happier with the Gray Gamma 2.2 working space profile. It is just matching up very well with all of the papers I use. My monitor didn't just 'magicly' profile itself. I tweaked it for about three weeks to get what I wanted. Again, just using the eyeball and basic tools. It would have been a lot faster had I had a Spyder, or something like that. But, in the end, no better. THere's actually a lot more to this because I was trying to get the monitor 'right' with the Epson drivers on the 9600 (after digesting two books on color management). Even though all of the indications were that my monitor was right, the prints still didn't match. I installed IP, and the first print matched perfectly. I've been happy ever since. And, I've actually had to replace my monitor, under warranty, without any problems because I had the profiles already. Tom Baker "A. Huntley" <Alan.Huntley@...> wrote: Tom, Hmm, I must be missing the luck part! ;>) Anyway, tonight I played around with a Custom Dot Gain curve per the instructions posted in the Files section of the ImagePrint group. I believe Mitch Alland wrote this document. Thank you, Mitch. Being an alumni of the old Piezography school of B&W digital printing, I am fairly comfortable with Gains of the Dot, etc. Only took a couple of prints and now my printed image looks, to my eye (and my wife's) exactly like what I see in PS. I'm a happy camper. Will let the print dry overnight and check it again tomorrow just to make sure it doesn't "dry down" too bad. Now, my last issue is 16-bit grayscale. Doesn't seem to work for me, but, again, others report no problems with 16-bit files...naturally! :>( Alan Huntley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Baker" <tbaker1328@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 3:00 PM Subject: Re: Re: [Digital BW] 1280 vs. 2200 question > Alan - > > I'm on Win. I use Gray Gamma 2.2 or, the gray profile that comes from my Nikon 8000 for everything. I can't really tell the difference in the two. But, I'm consistent in my use of ICC profiles. Seems to work just fine. And I don't use anything to calibrate my moitor except the PS gamma tool and my eye. I think there's some luck involved here somewhere, too. Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Re: [Digital BW] 1280 vs. 2200 question
2003-10-28 by Tom Baker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.