* -----Original Message----- * From: Alan.Huntley@... [mailto:Alan.Huntley@...] * Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:00 AM * To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com * Subject: RE: Re: [Digital BW] 1280 vs. 2200 question * * * Hi Martin, * * Thanks for the tip...I'll look into your suggestion. The one * thing I don't like about setting a Custom Dot Gain as your * gray working space is that it's paper specific. In other * words, if an image is worked up in PS with the working space * set for one paper (PR, for example) and, then, you decide to * print on a different paper (EEM, maybe) you've got a * problem...the current "soft proof", if you will, could be * (probably will be) incorrect. You are right. You should have a standard gray working space, generally Gray Gamma 2,2, and us it for all files. That's why Tyler's method works so well. It is a true soft proof method as Adobe intended with PS. The Proof Profiles actually become common profiles available to other Adobe applications as well.
Message
Soft Proofing was RE:1280 vs. 2200 question
2003-10-28 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.