--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Carolyn Frayn <carolyn@u...> wrote: > Mark, are we free to use this wittecism on our web sites??!! ;-) > Wonderful!!! Fine to use anything I write. But since I write with dyes instead of pigments, you'd better cut'n'paste pretty fast. By tomorrow, that post will probably be hard to read. ---- I know we're all kidding around about this, but seriously, am I the only one that's concerned, or is getting this weird vibe when I mention that they're inkjet prints? I know that all this is temporary; someday, one day, hopefully all inks will be at least pigment, if not something much better that hasn't even been invented yet. And I know that since I work with MIS dyes, I'm even more sensitive to it (but at least my prints aren't green by the window any more). From all these suggestions, I like anything with the word "carbon" in it. Carbon has that connotation like it's the oldest substance on the entire planet. Carbon is Biblical. Carbon is The Book of Genesis. My issue is that I don't think MIS color dyes contain carbon; I think you guys are talking about Piezo inks having carbon. So again, I'm left behind. What about "Photographic dye ink on watercolor paper"? Is that too wordy? I like the word "ink"; ink sounds long-lasting, like the Declaration of Independence. "Dye" sounds like Rit Dye, which doesnt' sound permanent. But I honestly DO think that conversations like this are healthy; just to keep this permance/language thing in the forefront.
Message
Re: Lenswork Issue (Our New Slogan)
2001-10-07 by Mark Tucker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.