--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Garry Sarre" <garry@s...> wrote: > > > > I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think > > most of these printer drivers are capable of processing a layered > > image-at some point it has to get flattened and your adjustments > > applied so doing as much as possible in 16-bit makes sense, at > least > > in theory. However,I seem to remember some rip-snorting arguments > on > > this forum as to wether or not you could actualy see the damage in > a > > print. > > > > Steve Karafyllakis > > Steve > > I don't think I was very clear as the responses have gone off on a > tangent. I DO definately get degradation with 8 bit adjustments. I > just wondered if there was any advantage to THE FINAL PRINT by doing > those adjustments in an adjustment layer as opposed to the actual > image file. > > Garry Sarre > www.sarre.com.au Garry; Sorry, you're right we are of on a tangent; My take is that there is no advantage to the final print; the advantage is in keeping your file in good enough shape to re-adjust as often as you like with out accumulated degradation. BTW I got a MAC Mall catalogue in the mail yesterday, they had a 4-page add on PSCS, I hope it gets released on time; this is one time I'm willing to put up with product activation w/out complaints! Steve K
Message
Re: Levels destruction in adjustment layers?
2003-10-31 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.