it does, i'm not exactly sure what james is referring to. the 4000 does come in a pro proofing model which prints only cmyk to simulate a press run so maybe that's what he's thinkin'. if the 4000 does in fact print better b&w, then it does it with drivers and not ink. that is it incorporates some sort of RIP-esque feature, like Imageprint, QTR or OPM, to improve b&w performance. --- "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@...> wrote: > > From: James Sims > [mailto:james@...] > > > > Epson does not seem to recommend the 4000 as a > photographer > > solution. There has been some considerable > discussion just recently > > regarding the 4000 having a slightly higher DMax > than, say the 2200 > > or 7600/9600, however, if you read more carefully, > there is also > > some slight differences in the specs regarding > color crossovers, > > metamerisms, and the quality of the entire black > and white tonal > > range. > > But I thought it used the same ink. > > -- > > Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco > Paul mailto:pderocco@... > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Ultra Tones & Dedicated B&W vs ImagePrint & 7-Color
2003-10-31 by john eckenrode
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.