Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] QTR, GIMP-PRINT resolution

2003-10-31 by john eckenrode

Hi Roy
Any idea when this update might be posted? not trying
to be pushy i guess i'm just excited. now that
ultatone carts for the 2200 are available it opens up
a new world. i also use a 1200 dedicated to black and
white that i am currently getting set up in QTR so
that's gonna take a bit of time. but i am feeling more
and more that my 2200 is going to replace the 1200 as
it simply prints better than the 1200.
Thanks
john e 

--- Roy Harrington <roy@...> wrote:
> 
> The beta8 version is the older version that matches
> the old profiles.
> A new release coordinated with the corresponding new
> profiles needs to done.
> 
> Roy
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com,
> Carl Schofield <scho@m...> 
> wrote:
> > John,
> > 
> > The dot size weighting adjustment for the 2200
> required a patch and I 
> > don't know if this patch has been applied to the
> QTR version currently 
> > on Roy's download page.  Perhaps Roy can clarify
> this point.  The matte 
> > paper profiles on my filesharing site are for the
> QTR version without 
> > the dot size weighting adjustment.  I've
> re-linearized the EEM and 
> > Premier profiles for the QTR version with the dot
> size weighting 
> > adjustment, but I haven't uploaded them yet.
> > 
> > Carl
> > On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 09:02  PM, john
> eckenrode wrote:
> > 
> > > Carl
> > >
> > > Thanks, I actually ordered the UT grey carts a
> couple
> > > days ago, my thinking is to use those in
> conjunction
> > > with Epson black and the UC colors for any
> toning. I
> > > figure the more OEM I can use, the less chance
> for
> > > problems and the less cartridges to change out.
> I
> > > print a lot of color too so that is a mild
> concern.
> > > Here is my question: I use QTR version 2 beta 8,
> is
> > > that the one with the dot weighing corrections
> or is
> > > it something you integrated into your curves? I
> was
> > > thinking I would use your curves as a starting
> place
> > > to tune and linearize my printer and paper combo
> if
> > > that's where the dot weighing comes in. I am
> still
> > > kinda sussing out QTR so pardon me if this
> sounds
> > > stupid.
> > >
> > > (By the way I used your basic EEM OEM curves
> last
> > > night on the Entrada Natural 300 paper and the
> Premier
> > > Fine Art paper just to get an idea of what these
> > > papers offered and I got very promising results.
> The
> > > Entrada is nice but the Premier looks great. I
> see no
> > > reason for people to buy a RIP when QTR works
> this
> > > well with OEM ink.)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > John Eckenrode
> > >
> > > --- Carl Schofield <scho@m...> wrote:
> > >> John,
> > >>
> > >> I made some QTR profiles for printing at high
> > >> resolution (2880x1440)
> > >> with the 2200 using the MIS Ultratones.  Ink
> limits
> > >> had to be cut way
> > >> back to avoid the flooding problem, but they do
> give
> > >> very smooth prints
> > >> without artifacts.  Major problem is that
> printing
> > >> is extremely slow,
> > >> so I don't use them.  Now that the dot size
> > >> weighting has been adjusted
> > >> for the 2200 I find that 1440x720 HQ gives
> equally
> > >> smooth prints at
> > >> higher printing speed and also no banding or
> other
> > >> artifacts.
> > >>
> > >> Carl
> > >> On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 07:22  PM,
> > >> ejohn182002 wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> does anyone out there familiar with GIMP-PRINT
> > >> know when the
> > >>> resolution issues will
> > >>> be corrected? when printing to a 2200 with a
> > >> resolution higher than
> > >>> 1440X720 GIMP/
> > >>> QTR floods the page with ink. my problem lies
> in
> > >> that printing
> > >>> 1440x720 sometimes
> > >>> reveals a slight horizontal banding, its not
> awful
> > >> but its there, and
> > >>> its worse on some
> > >>> papers than others. when i print color i find
> that
> > >> the slight banding,
> > >>> if any, is always
> > >>> cured printing 2880x1440. i also like the
> added
> > >> detail of 2880, its
> > >>> subtle but
> > >>> noticeable. any thoughts or info?
> > >>> thanks
> > >>> john eckenrode
> > >>>
> 
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.