Thanks Paul for your full response. On MIS website, I don't see that UT is available for the 870. Guess they could "chip" it?? re the curves- I have used the curves for 1270 and 870 (my 1270 died recently). So I assume I could use the 1280 curves for 870. Yes? Do you know what the dmax is for EEM, UT and 1270/870? Higher, I assume than the C82. Didn't understand your explanation of EEM .01 warm and cool. If you have time, could you please flesh that out a little more. thanks, Antara --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Antara, > > >I have 870 with MIS VM, using Roark curves.. Am considering the > >C82 after all the excitement here. > >How would you compare the two? > > The 870 may be the better printer. The UT inks, however, are better than > the VM inks in terms of longevity (and tones, in my view). So, if the UT > inkset ran well with the curves and in your printer, there would not be much > reason to change. > > The C82 is part of an effort to have a very affordable and easy archival B&W > printing solution -- for anyone. For what it is and costs, it's doing a > very good job. I'm putting the finishing touches on a neutral inkset now. > > The weaknesses of the C82 are, first, that its dmax is a bit low. With the > neutral inkset I'm seeing 1.58-9 on EEM and 1.59-60 on PhotoRag. > > Second, of course, is that it, like the 870, cannot print larger than > letter-size paper. > > Third, like all monotone inksets, the tones cannot be fine-tuned in the same > way the vm & UT inksets can. And, of course, there is not ability to do > split-tone printing. > > In the neutral inkset for the C82 I've compromised the neutral tone as > follows: EEM is 0.01 cool, and PhotoRag is 0.01 warm at 50%. > > On the other hand, the C82 has a unique trick here. If the warm (UT light > C) ink is put in the yellow spot, EEM is then 0.01 units warm. If a warm > ink cart is put in the magenta spot, EEM is then 0.04 units warm. To switch > between these, in fact, I just swapped the yellow and magenta position > carts -- they are all interchangeable. So, with 2 inks, much more fine > tuning is possible on the C82 than on most monotone inksets. > > The forth weakness or quirk of the C82 is that the head often nicks the > bottom 3/16 inch of the paper. So, there is sometimes if not often a little > ink on the bottom right corner. > > I don't know how well the existing curves work on the 870 for the UT inks. > For PC users with 1270s the 1280 driver seems to work. That way they can > use the 1280 UT curves. If that approach works for the 870 and you, then it > might be worth trying a UT cart. > > >Also, is it possible to do the same or similar with the C80. ... > > I don't know. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] C82 or 870?
2003-11-06 by Antara Scales
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.