--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Tyler Boley" <tyler@t...> wrote: > People think we're just picking one of these babies up at Costco, > pluging it in and hitting the print command. At least part of that sentence IS TRUE. So it's not totally unfounded. I would suggest to Epson that they create a "sub-brand" for their pro printers, and call it something other than "Epson". Kinda like Toyota did with Lexus, and Nissan did with Infiniti. I'd almost suggest the same for Nikon to do that with their digital pro line. I came in to all this technology after Iris, and Giclee, but at least when you say the word Giclee correctly, it does have some mojo and romance to it. Even the word Iris has some degree of curiosity. If I were Epson, I'd leave everything alone, from the 13x19 size printers and below. But starting at 24" models, I'd change the name to something more luxurious and mysterious. Actually, from this point forward, my 7000 is now known as The Insipid 7000 (translation: The Fader, but no one but Nina knows that). See -- doesn't that already seem like I could charge more for the prints!? We've got to get away from "computer brands" and work toward "art brands". -The Tuck
Message
Re: The Name Issue and Other Ramblings
2001-10-07 by Mark Tucker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.