I thought you said you had a hard time getting this down in words...? This post is right on... I totally agree, we are lumped in with the masses of desktop printers everywhere. Whether you are using a small, medium or large output inkjet and different inks makes no never mind to joe blow. I find it disheartening to think it makes no never mind to art/gallery people also. Do you have a special bong mix to "get inside their heads" Mark?? ;-) Carolyn > I think you are missing the very big picture; you need to zoom out > much further. In the grand scale, you are being lumped into this > one big category called "computer-generated inkjet printers", in > their eyes. I'm not in any way defending their perspective, I am > merely offering an opinion of what I think the vast majority of > art/gallery people think. > > They are not informed enough to make the subtle distinction > between professional quads and consumer dyes. You do this > every day, so you're super-aware of the distinctions. But I think > we're trying to address an entire cultural opinion of this field; and > I'd say that the masses do not make these distinctions. > > We must first force ourselves to think like them; to get inside > their heads and understand their fears and apprehensions, in > order to begin to alter the mindset of this issue.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The Name Issue and Other Ramblings
2001-10-07 by Carolyn Frayn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.