px3n120x wrote: >Since you think you know better, why not start your own win32 software company to >satisfy that huge market you talk about and fill your pockets at the same time. > > SNIP > >Missed market opportunity? Arrogance? > > I didn't decide to start my own software division/company as Bowhaus already has. More saliently, I'm not the one whose press releaser from March 25, 2003 says, in part: "A Windows and OS X version of Inkjet Control will be announced soon." Bowhaus is the one who made that PUBLIC commitment.. At the very least, if what I hear is true, they owe the user community/public an update or correction of the old press release. [As for your name calling and personal attack upon me I'd be VERY careful about crossing that line on this list.. Antonis and Martin have a history of little tolerance for such behavior on this list.. If you want to engage in personal invective feel free to e-mail me offlist and I'll gladly respond in kind..] OTOH: I'm not wholly surprised by the passion shown or the way this is taken personally by some in discussing this topic. There seems to be, among some Mac-o-philes at least, a tendency to over-the-top defenses of products that are offered only on Mac OS's - an attitude you rarely see among Windoze users (I have and do use BOTH OS's - and have equally castigated vendors for dropping Mac OS support, or failing to offer products in Mac versions that had particular use or no competing/similar product type offerings in the Mac market - I also do use Linux and have even participated in BETA'ing commercial products for the graphics market ported to Linux - so, I'm no OS pig/snob). In thinking about this, it may be an outgrowth of the frustration of many Mac users at the vast amount of product offered only for WinTel - a kind of OS-based "good for you.. see what we deal with all the time?".. The fact is, it doesn't change the economics of the decision. I'd ask defenders and current users of OPM/IJC to step back for a moment and separate the economics from the OS issues.. This is not a Mac vs. WinTel issue, so let's not turn it into a nasty little subset of that debate. It's about whether one company is going to maintain fidelity with their press release and product pronouncements. It's about what effect a deviation from promises made might have for them and the broader market they might serve, as well as what effect those same decisions could have upon the OS base they ALREADY serve. If you use OPM/IJC, ask yourself this: "is it better for end-users if more inkset vendors/manufacturers support the product more broadly, and is that support more or less likely without a WinTel version?" The broader the vendor/manufacturer support, the better for ALL users in the B&W digital niche market. Keith Krebs "Just some guy," and caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys"
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Bowhaus development and IJC/OPM ("what the heck ARE they thinking?")
2003-11-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.