Digital BW, The Print

It's very possible that I'm recalling what PR looked like under
incandescent lighting. I'm viewing them next to a window under
midday north light today; last year I was doing most of my 
printing in the evenings.

Thanks to both of you who responded--this puts my mind at ease.
I was worried I hadn't stored the paper correctly.

david

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Jack M Kucy 
<jmk@j...> wrote:
> In my opinion it's much warmer.  When you thought they are close 
you 
> must have looked at them using a normal household incandescent 
light. 
>  Then the difference is not that obvious I suppose.
> Jack
> 
> _________________________________________________
> Jack M Kucy
> JMK Gallery (www.jmk-gallery.com)
> 917-991-2096     jmk@j...
> Member of ASMP (www.asmp.org)
> _________________________________________________
> ...a riveder le stelle
> 
> 
> David Wroblewski wrote:
> 
> > I just (re)opened a box of Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 308
> > that I haven't used since I printed Christmas
> > pictures last year. I loosely resealed the box and set
> > it aside last December.
> >
> > My recollection is that Photo Rag is virtually the same
> > color as Epson Enhanced Matt.
> >
> > When I look at it now, however, it is distinctly warmer
> > than EEM, a light creamy color. Not ugly, just warmer than
> > I expected. The warm tone is totally even on all sheets
> > of the paper in the box. It doesn't look like discoloration,
> > but on the other hand, I could swear it was closer to
> > EEM-white when I first used it. But maybe I've just gotten
> > too used to looking at EEM...
> >
> > Could someone confirm that Photo Rag is indeed warmer
> > than EEM?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --