Playing with the Gaussian noise will yeild a decent grain effect. I have played around with it trying to "hide" digital noise in the "grain." To get a Tmax3200 kind of effect I may try printing one BO on a 2200... just might work out better that way. mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "chatzebussi" <chatzebussi@y...> wrote: > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Conrad Weiser > <radimus@p...> wrote: > > Rad > > I think this not what I am after. At least I feel that noise and grain > are (visually) not the same. But then I am not an expert. Thanks > anyway for the hint. > > Chatzebussi > > > Maybe raise the digicam's ISO so you increase the noise level in the > > picture? > > > > Rad > > > > chatzebussi wrote: > > > Steve > > > > > > I couldn't agree more! > > > > > > Any suggestions on how to bring back real, good looking > > > (old-fashioned) "grain" in(to) the world of digital B&W capture? So > > > far I haven't come across a software solution that can emulate the > > > special aesthetical quality of high-speed-film grain. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Chatzebussi > > > > > > > > >>A few months ago I narrowed down what seems to be a glaringly > > > > > > obvious > > > > > >>point. My scanned film has grain. My Scala work and Neopan work > > > > > > has > > > > > >>grain. Film highlights have dots - its grain. Grain works well > > > > > > with > > > > > >>BO printing - Eureka. I have several prints from Neo400 / 1600 > > > > > > that > > > > > >>look significantly better with BO than with hex. > > >> > > >>Now on the digital side, I have used a Fuji S2 for about a year and > > >>the pretty much noisless/grainless output compared to my 35mm film > > >>work means that the BO dots are much more visible as the black > > > > > > tries > > > > > >>to make up the clear highlight end of the spectrum. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, > Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you > wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by > visiting this same page. > > > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > > - Include your full name with your message. > > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages > to keep them short. > > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject > header. > > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames > > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the > various resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Black only printing. -> digital capture vs film
2003-11-26 by Mark Hahn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.