Peter, >...How does the UT inkset differ from the VM set, >particularly regarding the look of the prints, This is subjective, so I was going to let others answer. Here are a couple of things that come to mind for me. First, I like the neutral/"selenium" look of the UT inkset neutral curve. The VM was 0.04 cold at first to offset expected warming of 0.08. Second, the UT inkset can go considerably warmer than the VM inkset. > the black density, On EEM, the Eboni is darker than the VM K. > and tendency towards nozzle clog problems? MIS was eager to get rid of the VM K because the co-solvent evaporated through the CFS tubing. Supposedly that would be eliminated with the Eboni black. One negative is that Eboni is more sensitive to dyes. I have had a little trouble getting Eboni started on both a 1280 and 3000. With the 1280, I thought the rinsing of the parking pads with Windex to clean off the dyes from the OEM inkset did the trick. With the 3000, just letting it sit and print for a while took care of the problem. I suspect it was air in the ink. On both printers the Eboni settled down in a couple of days and has been fine. Aside from those 2 issues, the inkset had been clog-free. > Is UT stable now for matte printing? I think so. Paul www.PaulRoark.com ______________________________ --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, > Paul Roark wrote: > > The 1290 curves were probably better than the 1280 curves for the VM > > inkset. > > For the UT inkset, the 1280 UT curves are the best. > > > > Paul > > www.PaulRoark.com > > Peter A. Klein wrote: > > > > > How do the MIS Ultratone hextone inks compare to the VM (Variable > > > Mix) inksets? My cartridges will run out soon, and I'm wondering > > > whether to switch from VM to Ultratone. > > > > > > I've been printing with VM for some time on an Epson 1280, using the > > > 1290 driver (which prints with smoother gradation) and Paul Roarke's > > > 1290 curves. I use prefilled cartridges. I'm reasonably happy with > > > the VM inks. Things I'd like to improve: > > > > > > 1. The density of the blacks, which are not as good as I got > > > printing B&W with color inks. > > > > > > 2. It would be nice to go back to the 1280 driver. > > > > > > 3. Proneness to clogging. I have experienced some clogging with the > > > VM inks after not printing for a week. Most took just a cleaning > > > cycle to clear up, but I had a "clog from hell" recently that > > > required Windex and hot water injections to clear. (And thanks to > > > everyone who helped me with that recently). > > > > > > I print matte now. I wouldn't mind trying something glossier at some > > > point. When I printed in a chemical darkroom, I used mostly glossy > > > paper without ferrotyping, or the old Kodak N "smooth" fiber papers. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > --Peter Klein > > > Seattle, WA Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
RE: [Digital BW] VM vs. Ultratone
2003-11-27 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.