Hi Peter, Before moving to ImagePrint and using my Epson 2200 for both color and B&W, I had migrated my Epson 1160, using Paul's curves and workflow, from the VM inkset to the new (at the time!) UltraTones. I was very satisfied with my initial results and even more so after receiving the latest curves from Paul. You also get longer lasting images to boot! Great inkset, IMHO. FWIW the UT inkset seemed to be slightly (and I mean ever so slightly) more prone to clogging in my 1160. However, a couple of cleaning cycles with nozzle checks and I was always good to go. As for matte printing, I pretty much use EEM and PR, exclusively. Hope this helps. Alan Huntley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter A. Klein" <pklein@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 10:36 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] VM vs. Ultratone > But my original question remains unanswered: How does the UT inkset > differ from the VM set, particularly regarding the look of the > prints, the black density, and tendency towards nozzle clog > problems? Is UT stable now for matte printing? There was some > contradictory information on the MIS website, some pages saying it > was experimental and in bulk only, and others saying cartridges are > now available. > > Has anyone out there made the switch from VM to Ultratone, and are > you happy you did?
Message
Re: [Digital BW] VM vs. Ultratone
2003-11-27 by A. Huntley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.