Mark Hahn wrote: >personally, I think they are all expensive pointless tools... > For a hobbyist, perhaps... But for a pro time IS money.. I can do variations much more quickly (and easily repeatably) via the plug ins than farting around with the channel mixer or actions.. >but I >do have a good friend who likes buying things like this just to hold >his hand till he actually learns how to do something... > Here we go with implied insults of those who use plugins or filters instead of using the basic tools built into PhotoShop instead... That kind of implied PhotoShop (or any software) elitism or inferring/implying that others are too LAZY to take the time to learn technique X or Y irks the heck out of me... It's really not much different from those who eschew digital b/c with the right tools, darkroom, technique, and time you can do many of the same things without going digital... That issue aside: 1) Sometimes you also need to replicate the toe or spectral sensitivity of specific films.. I suppose that the time spent creating the actions one would need makes sense if you have forever to play around with PhotoShop and your time is near worthless.. Did I forget to mention that you'd need numbers on the spectral responses and the data for colored gels (Wratten) pass through as well? OR you'd need specific example images and a book of shots done with different gels - that's certainly manageable... NOT Of course, you'd still have to sit there comparing on-screen to your sample book until you turn blue.. 2) But for those of us who do this for something other than JUST fun; for those individuals it's ACTUALLY cheaper to buy a plugin or filter that saves us EVEN one hour of work... Figure it out, with a pro photog's time going for $150/hour minimum in any good market, and a PhotoShop/Graphics person's time going for nearly the same, if I save ONE hour total, I've paid for the filter... Even if you make $25 an hour... You pay for the filter if you save 6 hours of fiddling over the life of the filter.. Don't process a lot of images, have lots of time, is your time not worth much, and not faced with deadlines often.. Then many filters and plugins are generally a waste... YES, you can accomplish many of the same filters without special plugins or without even Fred Miranda's actions (even you imply those might be worth the $$, so where's the break-even point?).. But for many, the time saved is worth buying the tool someone else already created... I don't need to re-invent the car everytime I want to drive to granny's house... Nor does everyone want or need to understand how their VCR works, they are content simply popping a tape in and getting it to do what they want.. Keith Krebs "Just some guy," and caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys"
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: RGB Convert to Grayscale
2003-11-27 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.