I just could;t get to the page you are mentioning by clicking the link in your messages On my comouter when I click your link at the bottom of this message I get the older version with no ref to 2200 but got it another way thnaks you may want to update this link below --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@c...> wrote: > Hello Jerry, > > >really finding Clayton's articles useful. ( Although I notice it > >says revised nov 2003 but still hase 2002 dates in article > > I found in article #4 I missed changing the copyright date, got it > now, thanks for the sharp eyes. > > > >and talks about using a 1280 not a 2200) > > Not sure what you mean by this. The only place I mention a 1280 is in > the recommendations section of #3: > > "I recommend getting either the 1280 model or the 2200." > > > All of the detailed settings are for the 2200 in the "How To Do It" > section: > > "Here are the settings I use for Black-Only Printing with the 2200" > > > I don't think I mentioned the 1280 anywhere else. > > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: black only clayton, wrong link
2003-11-30 by jerdiakiw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.