Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Anthony G. Atkielski vs CJ

2003-12-01 by Paul D. DeRocco

> From: Anthony G. Atkielski [mailto:anthony@...]
>
> Just look at the EXIF data: the exposure compensation is given for each
> photo, and for most photos, there is a deliberate underexposure of from
> 1/3 to 2 stops.  Since deliberate underexposure in this way is only
> possible with operator intervention, I wondered why it was done.

The usual reason for such underexposure is that digicams clip highlights
hard, but shadows just descend into the noise. Therefore, you can generally
fix underexposure later, but not overexposure. I normally just leave my
Canon 10D set to -1 stop, to avoid blown highlights when I'm shooting
quickly. It's sensor is so quiet that I don't miss the 3db of S/N when I
bring the midtones up later in PS.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@...

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.