I haven't read the article, but most photographers I know who use TX "over expose" at least a stop, and "under develop" about 10%. I've done it that way for about 30 years. It's truly a gorgeous film at 160 instead of 320... and 200 instead of 400 for rolls. Maybe Kodak finally decided to rate it relative to the way it's used ________________________________________________________________ Never respond to spam, even to "unsubscribe." Fight back! SpamCop is free. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-02 by Ken Schuster