Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re[2]: [Digital BW] New Tri-X: anyone seen?

2003-12-02 by Anthony G. Atkielski

Clayton Jones writes:

> ... I was dissatisfied and kept coming back to good old Tri-X at 200
> (or 180 for the 4x5/320 stuff), with D-76 or HC-110.

What's the advantage to the considerable overexposure, and how much do
you adjust development to account for it?  I've always exposed and
developed as on the box; does something improve with overexposure.

I like everything about Tri-X except the grain (in 35mm--in larger
formats grain is much less of an issue).  If there is a way of
preserving everything overall but reducing grain, that would be very
cool.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.