Clayton Jones writes: > ... I was dissatisfied and kept coming back to good old Tri-X at 200 > (or 180 for the 4x5/320 stuff), with D-76 or HC-110. What's the advantage to the considerable overexposure, and how much do you adjust development to account for it? I've always exposed and developed as on the box; does something improve with overexposure. I like everything about Tri-X except the grain (in 35mm--in larger formats grain is much less of an issue). If there is a way of preserving everything overall but reducing grain, that would be very cool.
Message
Re[2]: [Digital BW] New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-02 by Anthony G. Atkielski