At 6:38 pm +0100 12/1/03, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: >Dennis W. Manasco writes: > >%< snip>% > > > I also viewed Mr. Atkielski's site. There were not very many >images to view. > >FWIW, currently there are over 1100 images on the site, although I >don't have an exact count. > >%< snip >% Here, I _will_ offer an apology. When I first viewed Mr. Atkielski's site I was only able to access a dozen or so images. Subsequent visits to the site revealed no more, but did reveal pages with what looked to be distorted formatting: numerous horizontal lines with unloaded-picture icons at the left of a black field. On one occasion my browser was able to see several of these pages as lists of photographs with descriptive text and visible links to Mr. Atkielski's photographs. I have not been able to duplicate this experience but, if Mr. Atkielski would like me to, I can illustrate the problem with screen captures (off list). There is probably either an incompatibility between the site's HTML and the rendering abilities of Internet Explorer version 5.2.3 (5815.1) on a Macintosh running OS X version 10.2.8, or a problem with one or more of the servers between his site and my computer. As an aside: Viewing more of his photographs by clicking on the unloaded-picture icons has altered my impression of Mr. Atkielski's final to-web exposure equivalence. I do not always agree with either it or his choice of contrast, but I do admit that my reaction to the images which I viewed on my initial visit to his site was precipitously overstated. -=-Dennis
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Anthony G. Atkielski vs CJ
2003-12-02 by Dennis W. Manasco
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.