Digital BW, The Print

I find it much more intutive to use than PS. If you want to graphic 
arts, PS is the way to go but if you are more interested in preparing a 
photograph for printing PW seems to be a better tool. The new version 
supports the use of the PS curves so you can use Pauls or anyone elses 
curves developed for PS.

Quite frankly then only thing I find myself using PS for is the  
"healing brush."  It's a good cloning tool removing dust, scratches, etc.

Truman

Sean wrote:

> Truman,
>   Is the newer version of PW a good tool for making BW injet prints. I 
> have version 2.0 of PW and am considering to upgrade to 3.5 Standard 
> or 3.5 Pro.
> What do you see as a greater benefit over Photshop.
>
> Sean
>
> ps it's been a long time since I worked with PW.   I usually use 
> Photoshop.
>
>