Victor Landweber writes: > Provides one additional zone of separation, allowing a distinction between > zones 9 and 10. > Either method allowed a slight distinction to be seen between zones 0 and 1. So it would seem that exposing Tri-X at the rated 400 gives better range, no? Any idea why Tri-X Pan Professional in 120 size is rated at ISO 320 instead of ISO 400?
Message
Re[2]: [Digital BW] New Tri-X: anyone seen?
2003-12-04 by Anthony G. Atkielski