I would add though that if using a Mac, it is well worth investing a little time and setting up QTR first. The RIP, thanks to Roy¹s generosity, costs $0 and produces fantastic B&W prints with OEM inks let alone, say, MIS UTs. Imageprint is severely mis-priced, even at $395 + tax (outside of the US it is simply insulting), particularly when compared to the cost of the printer, PS or even a low-end Mac to run QTR! I agree that if you have no choice as a PC user it gets the job done but it is unique in its ability to extract a heavy premium for doing so. From: Tim Atherton <timatherton@theedge.ca> Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 18:55:10 -0700 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Indecision and Confusion: Which B&W system to invest in! > I would second this because the cost is only a little more than > getting a second printer up and running and the lack of hassle is > worth more than the extra money. You can download a demo and give it > a try and see if it is good enough for you. Most the other RIPS have > free demos available as well so you might find a cheaper > alternative. ...as far as I'm concerned Epson owes everyone who > bought a 2200 a free RIP since the printer is advertised as printing > quality b&w out of the box, but at least with Imageprint it is fully > capable of giving you prints that you are sure to love. I think you can still get it for $100 off if you order a bunch of paper at the same time as well - so order the Imageprint and say $100 worth of Photo Rag tim [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Indecision and Confusion: Which B&W system to invest in!
2003-12-08 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.