A few years ago when I decided to forgo building yet another darkroom in another house - it may have had something to do with a divorce threat:-). I was disappointed that I could not exactly reproduce the look of my silver prints fiber based gloss photographic paper. Over the past year I have learmed to appreciate what my 1280 and VM inks can do on Photo Rag. I just got a set of UT carts so I'm looking forward to that. No it will never reproduce the same images as Brillance or Seagull, but I've learned to look beyond that to look even more to the image. The highlights on this paper with the VM ink are subtle and delicate. The highlights on Seagull can hit you in the head. There is a difference and after a time I've have come to appriciate the strengths of digital prints on matt paper. It's not better, but it's not inferior. It's a different medium. I have almost come to the conclusion that we are some how chasing the Holy Grail trying to do the same exact thing we did the the darkroom with paper and ink. I have - after lots of practice - some very nice images on Photo Rag. In fact I have some of the same negatives printed on Photo Rag that are better than I could ever get them in the wet darkroom on Seagull. Of course some images will require to high dynamic range (high Dmax) that can't be achieved on matt paper. But all in all I am quite pleased with what I am now seeing coming out of my printer. So pleased that I will give the paper companies a few more years to figure out this bronzing problem. After they do I will add glossy papers to my stock but I sure won't stop printing on matt paper. Truman
Message
The Holy Grail?
2003-12-10 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.