David - I don't necessarily disagree with you, but: at the rate which the digital printing technologies are progressing, we may reach the easy/dependable state before your latest batch of print developer goes bad. Tom Baker "David R. Spielman" <david@...> wrote: Dear Paul, Being one who has seen your own silver/gelatin AND digital prints shown side-by-side at the Solvang, CA show, I might agree with you. BUT, not everybody has the skill or the equipment that you posses. Many of us 'mere mortals' are still content to stay in our wet darkrooms. Using a digital negative is a nice way to bridge the gap between the analog photography paradigm and the digital world of inkjet printing, a world still filled with many landmines such as clogging print heads, paper material with fragile surface coatings that flake off if you look at them funny, bronzing and out gassing, and a whole litany of other issues that silver photography does not have. Making inkjet prints that have the level of excellence that you have achieved is by no means an easy task. I've told you before that I think your 'carbon-on-cotton' prints are in many ways far superior to any silver/gelatin print, but I also think that the process of making them, as a whole, should be called very high maintenance! :-) I'm sure that as inkjet technology continues to progress out of its infancy, we will see fewer and fewer of these problems. But for now, I'm not quite ready to give up my darkroom completely. Best Regards, David R. Spielman -----Original Message----- From: Paul Roark [mailto:paul.roark@...] Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 5:16 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail? >By making digital negatives with an inkjet printer, and taking them back >into the traditional wet darkroom, I have made many fine prints on >air-dried, glossy fiber paper. >With digital negatives, you have the best of both worlds. You have all of >the great silver papers that many have come to love, and you have the power >to modify and manipulate your images in Photoshop in ways that even the old >darkroom masters could not hope to achieve. Or is it the worst of both worlds. All the digital artifacts with the darkroom smells, non-buffered paper, non-washable gelatin coating, wavy paper from the water that needs dry mounting, questionable archival quality without strong toning that turns the print purple, ... You get the picture. ;) Seriously, I went this route once and, aside from temporary marketing advantages, I think the silver print is or should be considered an "alternative" process in the same category as the platinum print. Paul www.PaulRoark.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See �Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines� in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE �OWNER� AND �MODERATORS� OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-12 by Tom Baker
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.