Cort Anderson wrote: >I also had an IP attorney suggest that if you copyright a large number >of images in one batch that they could be perceived has having a lower >value because of the greater number. > >I am not an attorney and am just repeating what I have learned from >what I consider good sources. > > > Nor am I.. But, that valuation as a portion of the total issue came up in the seminal Texaco case.. AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION v. TEXACO INC., 60 F.3d 913 (2nd Cir. 1994) To cut to the chase: "The third factor, the amount and substantiality of the portion used, weighed heavily in favor of Academic Press. Texaco attempted to argue that each article represented only about 4% of the copyrighted journal. They argued that the copyrighted work was a compilation. The individual authors had assigned their interest to the publisher in exchange for having their work published. Texaco argued that because the entire copy of the publication had not been copied, they had not infringed on the copyright. The Court found the argument to be unpersuasive and determined that it would be extremely expensive and unreasonable for Academic Press to register each copyright for each article in every publication with the Copyright Office." http://www.jontzlaw.com/newsletters/copyright.htm So, simply registering a lot of works in one volume shouldn't have any bearing on perception of value... BUT, you can only recover that $200 - $150,000 per work / pre infringer.. That means if I infringe by publishing the same copy of one picture on ten websites you only get one award, and, here's the downside to registering a volume.. a court may decide that if I use ten different images from that volume, that I have violated your copyright on only one work - the volume (i.e. I've only violated your copyright once even though I used ten of your images). So, the more works you register in one volume, the less likely you can get multiple awards against the same infringing party. In any case, we could go on and on about actual damages vs. statutory damages, but it all begins to make my head hurt, so I'm not going to prattle on about this.. The basic lesson is: to get statutory damages (usually more attractive than compensatory actual damages) and attorney's fees, you need to have the image registered.. You can find out more at: http://www.krages.com/copy1.htm and http://www.dinoart.com/publications/prt1pg02.html Keith Krebs "Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ and the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User Community at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys"
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Copyright
2003-12-20 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.