Just returned from a holiday in Antigua and visted a lovely art gallery called Kate Spenser. she is an English artist who married a man form St Kitts many years ago and has been painting lustrous pa9nitngs in the caribbean ever since . She has two high end classy galleries that I know of,. the one in Antigua I visited and one where she lives in St kitts. All her work now is only available in 40 x 60 or even larger giclee prints in editions or 50 for 650$ US and they sell like hotcakes! Seems it is not a problem if you are a painter. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, J Vee <j.vee@g...> wrote: > Any fine art photographers successful in getting digital prints accepted for > sale in galleries, high end art fairs, etc? Strange, I can make a > "perfected" negative, could use for contact printing forty+ Silver prints in > an afternoon, and these would be considered hand made original prints. The > fact is that digital prints, no matter how excellent the image or the > printing, are somehow considered mechanical "reproductions" with relatively > little value. This fact, taken with the continuous print improvements > discussed in this forum, make me feel that we are in the midst of a major > and irreversible change in the way photographic prints are perceived by the > buying public, a change which will probably not be beneficial to those of us > who sell prints. Any thoughts?
Message
Re: Reproduction vs. Orig Fine Art Print?
2003-12-27 by jerdiakiw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.