No. 8-bits per channel does not mean the tonal range is reduced in any way. 8-bits per channel means you have 256 different values for expressing the full tonal range of each channel. 12-bits per channel gives you 4,096 values (most DSLRs, for example). 16-bits per channel means you have 65,536 possible values. More bits per channel means the tones in your image are more continuous. Hence, the image is less likely to posterize when you edit the image. (Nonlinear changes -- such as Levels, Curves, Hue/Saturation adjustments, etc. -- compress parts of the histogram and expand others, making it more likely you will see visible posterization in your image where there are gaps in your histogram. Until you start editing the image, the histogram for an 8-bit, 12- bit, or 16-bit scan are likely to look similar. The mischief doesn't begin until you start editing the image. ;) I stay in 16-bits throughout when possible, and as long as possible otherwise. My RAW files are converted to a 16-bit PSD file. With Photoshop CS, you can do nearly everything in terms of photo editing in 16-bit. If you want to preserve the highest image quality, stick with 16-bits. My master file flattens the working file, removes the alpha channels (necessary, if you use ImagePrint RIP), and saves it as a TIFF. My output files for the Epson 2200 are sharpened for printed output and any final Curve adjustment is applied. This is when I convert to 8-bits. Sending a 16-bit file to the Epson 2200 printer (or the ImagePrint RIP, in my case) gains you nothing in image quality. All you get is an output files that's twice the size. So, I wind up with: 1 RAW File (12-bits, compressed) 1 or more Photoshop working files: PSD with layers and channels (12- bits, compressed) 1 Master file: TIFF flattened and sans channels (12-bits, uncompressed) 1 or more Output files: TIFF (8-bits, uncompressed If I use a RAW converter instead of Adobe Camera Raw II in PS CS, then I also have: 1 Converted file: TIFF (12-bits, uncompressed) I hope this helps! Cheers, Mitch
Message
Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-03 by Glenn Mitchell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.