--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@i...> wrote: > > From: Glenn Mitchell [mailto:gmitchel850@y...] > > > > Noise becomes more apparent because of the effects of posterization > > as you edit the image. > > > > Chromatic noise which is barely noticeable when the image is loaded, > > for example, can be quite obvious as clumping or graininess after > > levels adjustments, curves adjustments, hue/saturation adjustments > > precisely because you are selectively expanding some information and > > selectively compressing other information. What starts out as > > continuous or near-continuous tones becomes less so. This effect > > will be more exaggerated with an 8-bit image than a 16-bit image. > > Sure, but at least you won't see outright banding. > That's not necessarily true at all. Noise comes in varying degrees. It's effects on an image are not always uniform. Luminosity noise is often speckled about. But chromatic noise often affects sky, shadows, water and is less/non-evident elsewhere in an image. Noise is a separate issue from posterization owing to nonlinear transformations during image editing. There is no reason to expect noisy images from a digicam to obliterate all evidence of posterization. Cheers, Mitch
Message
[Digital BW] Re: 16 Bit vs. 8 Bit for BO
2004-01-05 by Glenn Mitchell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.