Bob Frost writes: > The Minolta 5400 and Nikon 5000 scanners claim to > be 16-bit, and my graphics card (Matrox P750) > claims to be 10-bit. Graphics cards are largely digital devices so they can easily be any number of bits; how good they are at actually generating 65,536 different voltage levels for each color channel on output is a different matter. No monitor can reliably display data with that kind of resolution, anyway. The same is true for a scanner. It could be set up to provide 16 bits of output, but whether those low-order bits are actually useful or not is debatable. Still, if a device isn't built to provide them, you're guaranteed not to get them, whereas if it _is_ built to provide them, you've at least got a chance of getting them (the hardware design doesn't limit you, although the build quality might).
Message
Re[2]: [Digital BW] 16 bit vs 8 bit difference, Re Glen Mitchell´s posting
2004-01-05 by Anthony G. Atkielski